Decompose
What has to be true?Identify the ecological, operational, and accounting assumptions driving projected delivery.
Every carbon forecast is built on assumptions. We test the evidence behind those assumptions, identify where they create material risk, and translate that risk into expected carbon delivery.
A repeatable diligence process for moving from the claims behind a carbon forecast to the risks that actually matter for delivery.
Identify the ecological, operational, and accounting assumptions driving projected delivery.
Evaluate the data and scientific evidence behind the assumptions that matter.
Test plausible alternatives and identify which uncertainties materially affect delivery.
Where needed, independently reconstruct the material components of the forecast and propagate uncertainty.
Translate the analysis into expected delivery, downside, and the key drivers of underperformance.
Not every decision requires a new carbon model. We focus the analysis on the level of uncertainty and materiality behind the decision.
Independent technical review of the evidence and assumptions underlying projected delivery.
Targeted analysis to quantify the assumptions most likely to change expected delivery.
Independent reconstruction of expected carbon delivery and uncertainty.
See how we apply the Delivery Risk Framework across different project types and levels of analysis.
See case studies →We help investors, developers, and other carbon-market participants understand what sits behind the forecast—and what could cause it to change.